EI84mzk2E8AmuBYt0y5NY8kJU3M
nav-left cat-right
cat-right

Bye Lehman Brothers (And I Don’t Mean Buy)

lehman brothers
photo by pijus

It’s been a long weekend for Lehman Brothers and the rest of the financial sector. After three days of meeting with the Feds it looks like it may be over for the 158 year old company. Lehman Brothers Stated today that they will be filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Who knows what will happen to them now that no one is willing to buy them. Barclays walked away over the weekend when they couldn’t get the government back up support.
.
I glad to see that the government has finally decided to leave my tax money out of Wall Street, unfortunately they didn’t do it earlier. They need to stay out of the stock market in more ways than one. Government bail-outs should not be happening on any level. It’s too bad that the management staff of these financial companies gamble with the shareholders money and lost all of it and then some, but that’s what business is all about. Looking at the risks, coming up with a strategy and implementing it. Most business (estimated 90%) will fail in the first few years and for the ones that make it, it will be hard for them for some time if they don’t have a solid game plan. For a company that has been around since the Civil War and then lose everything 158 years later because of bad management decisions and greed…someone should pay or at least brought to justice on behalf of the shareholders.
.
What is to happen to the management of Lehman Brothers after the doors have been closed? I’m sure nothing but good things will happen to Richard Fuld CEO after the dust has settled. Why is it that many Americans will have more damage done to their 401K plans because of this? While Mr. Fuld will walk away with millions of dollars for his hard work at Lehman Brothers. I hope everyone that reads this blog got out of the financials awhile ago.

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Solar Power May Not See The Light

Solar power has been a hot subject and it’s future is not looking so bright. I don’t actually believe that, but that’s what the Industry and the government want us to think. Over the weekend a report came out in regards to the tax credits for alternative energies like solar and wind.
Congress has to renew them before they expire on December 31. These tax credits will help the industry with the plans for expansion, but without the credits solar and wind companies may not be able to make it happen. In fact they may be forced to cut back on many things including capitol investment and payroll.
These tax credits have made it possible for solar to be cost-competitive with other renewable energies. As it is solar energy is the least efficient of the alternative/renewable energy sector (except for ethanol). Many plants that are in the planning stage are at risk because of the sand-bagging by Congress.

Wind power is having the same problem of getting investors. The American Wind Energy Association is predicting that they will lose about 76,000 jobs as well as over $11 billion in investments as a result if Congress doesn’t do something to renew the credits. Greg Wetstone, a spokesman for the association said, “Investors like to know what tax policies apply when they are putting millions of dollars down on a project. There’s a pretty clear history that these projects are less likely to go forward without a credit.”

In the past Congress has let these credits expire three different times and wind installation in those years slowed over 77% each year. Estimates are expected to be at those same levels for 2009 if Congress doesn’t do something for the industries. According to Congressional estimates, the credits are to total $334 million.

Senator Jeff Bingaman, a Democrat from New Mexico said, “These companies are shutting down projects, firing people and it’s Congress’s fault,” the Senator is the chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. The sad thing is that these clowns are still on vacation including Bingaman, who was one of the main politicians that pushed for vacation over oil drilling in America.

As we all know, Congress has made it quite difficult for these alternative energies to make great advancements because of all the delays and waste of time that the Congressman have done.
In 2006, Congress didn’t come together on a tax-extender deal until December, forcing the IRS to delay processing returns claiming several of the tax breaks. In 2007 Congress again never agreed on extenders until December, causing more IRS disruption, to settle another annual tax crisis, the alternative minimum tax. As a matter of fact, Congress has let these credits to expire 13 times since 1981.

All these delays have caused uncertainty with the industry has to where to do their research and development. At this rate it may be wise for them to head overseas to get it done. There are over 20 countries that offer tax incentives while the United States doesn’t have any. I won’t get into the political side of these tax credits in this post (I’ll save it for another day), but these games of playing with the tax breaks expiration is nothing new and only helps the politicians hide the fact of the ever-growing federal budget deficit.

Tags: ,

Related posts

Barack Insane Obama

Mr. Obama is in Europe(just in case you’ve been under a rock or something), visiting various countries and political leaders. Making speeches in front of 200,000+ German citizens. None of which is to be considered a campaign event(yeah, OK).
He has been running around at break-neck pace without any schedule breaks. Until this morning when he had to cancel one event giving him time for himself. You wonder what event wasn’t so important to keep like all the others. It was a visit to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center to see injured American soldiers. It seems that Obama and his aides were concerned that the visit would be viewed as campaign event. I think it’s a little too late not to think of this trip as anything else.
.
Robert Gibbs, a senior strategist stated, “The senator decided out of respect for these servicemen and women that it would be inappropriate to make a stop to visit troops at a U.S. military facility as part of a trip funded by the campaign,”
Why the hell would he go to other countries funded by the campaign? Isn’t that money to be used for campaigning in the United States. It’s not the first time Mr Obama has made poor judgment decisions and I’m pretty sure that it wont be the last.
.
I know that you might be thinking that this has nothing to do with the stock market and you’re probably right. It just brings me to another poor judgment made by Barack Hussein Obama. He wants to raise the capitol gains tax from 15% to around 28-30%. I work very hard to manage the accounts that I have and to think my hard work is going to help fund more programs that don’t really need to be created, drives me crazy(it’s a short drive though). The markets have taken a beating this year and who knows what will happen after the election(no matter who becomes President). I’m watching it very carefully and being prepared for anything.
.
What’s your take on this? all comments are welcomed.

Tags:

Related posts

Foreclosure Issues

One of the biggest stories in recent months has been the foreclosure problems and the credit crisis in America. Many people have lost their homes already and more are in danger of the same situation. I myself know five people who are faced with it. I feel bad for all that are involved in this mess, but who is really to blame and who should bear the burden of it all.
.
Well, let’s start with the blame. First we have the banks and mortgage companies that came up with the idea of an adjustable fixed mortgage for people with bad credit or not enough for the down payment. It seems that they were not forth coming with all the stipulations in the contract and how it would effect the monthly payments. They knew that they shouldn’t have lowered the standards by which someone qualifies for a loan. The mess that they’re in right now with all the write downs and the price of their shares are because of their own actions, Boo Hoo. Maybe the CEO and the executives should give back all those millions that they received as bonuses back to the company and the shareholders(dream on).
.
What about the appraisers that inflated the prices of those homes knowing damn well that their assessment weren’t near the actual value of the house. It’s came out recently that some were being paid “under-the-table” to exaggerate the prices(oh, what a surprise).
.
As for the people who applied for those loans. They too need to take some of the blame for not reading the fine print and understanding the break down of the contract. One person I know that is in this situation, actually refinanced over the phone with a mortgage broker. I’ve never signed anything in my life without reading everything or having an attorney go over the papers for me. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve been heavily in debt and had to dig my way out of it myself. I didn’t blame the credit card companies, I blamed myself.
.
Now for who should bear the burden of this and help all these people out. Like I said before, I worked on fixing my credit with the help of the CC companies. I work out a plan and stuck to it. When my wife and I bought our house, we didn’t go ahead and buy our “dream home”. We looked around for a house that we would be able to afford the monthly payments. I also did my due diligence on what was involved with having a loan(it was our first and still the home that we purchased). When we paid off our home, we did it with our money. We weren’t able to go to some government agency and say “we cant pay for our home, help us”.
.
The only solution to this whole crisis is to have all people who were involved in each loan come back to the table and work out a new contract. Maybe the only involvement the government should have is to oversee and regulate the problem, not throw our tax dollars to other people’s mistake.
Then again, what do I know.
If you have any comments or insight to this post, please do so. I welcome all opinions.

Tags: , , ,

Related posts

GDP (Gross Domestic Product) Vs GPI (Genuine Progr...

The GDP, aka Gross Domestic Product. The means by which our country’ growth is measured. The most common way to understand the GDP is the expenditure method.
.
GDP= consumption+gross investment+ government spending+(export-imports)
GDP= C+I+G+(X-M)
.
By my calculations, this equation can’t be as sound as it seem’. Am I to understand that government spending is to be looked upon as something good? From what I can see is that if consumption(personal) falls less than what government spending goes up, the GDP will still rise for that year. That would be looked upon as something good. That doesn’t sound right to me. When government spending rises, it leaves the politicians no other choice but to raise taxes. Which we all know you’ll be paying.
.
There are too many variables that need to be considered in this equation. That is why in 1995 the GPI(genuine Progress Indicator) was created. It takes into account those variables in each part of the GDP.

They both are based on the same personal consumption data, but that is where the similarities end. Here is the list of categories that they differ. The GPI makes a lot of sense to me. Then again, who am I?
.
The following information was provided by Lisa Smith @ Forbes.com.
.
* Personal Consumption – As mentioned, this is the exact same data used to calculate GDP.
* Income Distribution – GPI is adjusted upward when a greater percentage of the nation’s income goes to the poor because an income increase provides a tangible benefit to the poor. GPI is adjusted downward when the majority of a nation’s increased income goes to the rich.
* Housework, Volunteering, Higher education – GPI factors in the value of the labor that goes into housework and volunteering. It also factors in the benefit of an increasingly educated populace.
* Service of Consumer Durables and Infrastructure – Money spent on durable goods is treated as a cost, while the value the purchases provide is treated as a benefit. Long-lasting goods that provide benefits without having to be frequently repurchased are viewed positively. Goods that wear out quickly and drain consumers’ wallets when they must be replaced are viewed negatively. GDP, on the other hand, views all expenditures as good news. Infrastructure spending by the government is treated in a similar manner – if spending provides a long-lasting benefit, GPI views it as a positive; if spending drains the government’s coffers, GPI views it as a negative. Again, GDP views all spending as positive.
* Crime – Rising crime costs money in legal fees, medical bills, replacement costs, and other outlays. GDP views this spending as a positive development. GPI views it as a negative.
* Resource Depletion – When wetlands or forests are destroyed by economic activity, GDP views the events as good news for the economy; GPI views these events as bad news for future generations.
# Pollution – Pollution is good news for GDP. Industry gets paid once for the economic activity that creates pollution and again when money is spent to mitigate the pollution. GPI views pollution as a negative.
# Long-Term Environmental Damage – Global warming, nuclear waste storage, and other long-term consequences of economic activity are factored into GPI as negatives.
# Changes in Leisure Time – Prosperity should lead to an increase in leisure time. Most modern workers would disagree with this theory. GPI views an increase in leisure as a positive, and a decrease in leisure as a negative.
# Defensive Expenditures – Defensive expenditures refer to medical insurance, auto insurance, healthcare bills and other expenses that are required to maintain quality of life. GPI views these as a negative. GDP views them positively.
# Dependence on Foreign Assets – When a nation is forced to borrow from other nations in order to finance consumption, GPI factors in the result as a negative. If the borrowed money is for investments and benefits the country, it is viewed as a positive.
The Calculations
GPI calculations take all of these variables into consideration, using economic statistics and mathematical formulas to place value on them. That value is then added to or deleted from the GDP figure. For example, expenditures on consumer durables are a negative adjustment. Data from the National Income and Products Accounts are used to estimate the cost of consumer durables, and the figure is subtracted from GDP.

The amount of money that foreigners invest in the U.S. is subtracted from the amount Americans invest overseas. A five-year rolling average is used to determine whether the U.S. is becoming a lender or a borrower. If our economy is healthy enough that we are a net lender, the resulting number is added to GDP. If we are borrowing to sustain our economy, the resulting number is subtracted.

GPI Is Not Yet Mainstream
While GPI factors in to many of the variables that have direct impact on peoples’ quality of life, capitalist economies tend to focus strictly on making money. Because of this, GPI has not yet been widely adopted in such economies, although its proponents note that it has been reviewed by the scientific community and recognized for its validity. GPI-type measures are in use in Canada and in some of Europe’s small and more progressive nations. Over time, other nations might slowly adopt the concept as environmental concerns move into the public’s consciousness.
lisa smith @ forbes

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Hasn’t The Federal Reserve Bank Done Enough ...

It seems that the Federal Reserve is going to be throwing a lifeline to Fannie and Freddie.
.
The plan must still be approved by Congress (which could mean that this may take awhile), but the Fed will not only serve as the lender of last resort to the ailing mortgage buyers but will also play a consult type role in their regulation.
The news this week comes four months after the Fed facilitated JPMorgan Chase’s $30 billion buyout of Bear Stearns and the Bush administration’s blueprint to overhaul the U.S. financial regulatory system, granting the Fed even more power. (isn’t that scary)

By coincidence, the central bank on Monday approved a new rule designed to protect consumers from deceptive lending practices, including advertising practices that say interest rates are fixed when in fact they’re not. It applies to all mortgage lenders, not just those under the Fed’s control.
.
I my opinion, It looks like the Fed are trying to fixed everything that they’ve been laid-back on for the last few years.
.
Starting tomorrow, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke begins two days of testimony on Capitol Hill as he delivers his semiannual economic report to lawmakers. He’ll talk about the growing threat of inflation, the government’s response to the Fannie and Freddie meltdown, the Fed’s recent actions to curb irresponsible lending and the overall economic outlook.

I don’t expect him to say the Federal Reserve is gaining too much authority

Tags: , , ,

Related posts