EI84mzk2E8AmuBYt0y5NY8kJU3M
nav-left cat-right
cat-right

American International Group, Inc. (AIG)

Here we go again. It seems that the government can’t make up it mind, yes I know that AIG is the Insurance leader and if it failed it would be very bad for everyone in this country, but when is the government going to stop flip-flopping on their decisions on who they’ll save and who they won’t.
the Central Bank stated in a statement that was posted on their website on Tuesday, “The [Federal Reserve] Board determined that, in current circumstances, a disorderly failure of AIG could add to already significant levels of financial market fragility and lead to substantially higher borrowing costs, reduced household wealth, and materially weaker economic performance”.
.

I mean how much worse can it get? The market dropped Monday 504 points after it decided to not throw Lehman a life line and yesterday they take a 80% stake in AIG and the market goes up 141 point. How much more instability do they want to see that there is no confidence in the American economy? I don’t know about you, but I expect another plunge in the Dow as well as the NASDAQ that again I’m going to sit on the sideline. As for my IRA account, I won’t be needing that for another 15 years or so and since it’s a nice nest egg, I’m going to just leave it where it is for now.
.
Our fearless leader in the Treasury department said on Monday, “What is going on right now in New York has got nothing to do with any bridge loan from the government,” Then what the hell is going on there Paulie?
The $85 billion loan that came from the Federal Reserve is aimed at keeping AIG out of bankruptcy and to stop the acceleration of the world credit crisis. Why is it that the taxpayers of the United States of America have to save the world economy? The last time I check, half of them have a problem with us and the other half don’t care about us either way.
.
I’m very frustrated from all this B.S. in our government right now. there is way to much government spending and no one is minding the store. The inmates are running the asylum and there not a damn thing we can do about it.
Then again if Obama wants to show that he’s for change, then maybe he can give the government that excess $70 million dollars that he received last month in donations to show that he really wants to help the country and that he’s not in it for himself.
Just to let you know… I’m not holding my breath.
.
P.S. while I’m thinking about it, Why did Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac give $125,000 to Obama (the second highest Senator) over the last three years. What is a government sponsored mortgage lender doing giving money to a politician?

Tags: , , ,

Related posts

Where Are The Investigations?

After yesterday’s 504.48 drop in the Dow one needs to ask where are the government investigations into this mess. Why is it that Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Bear Stearns were saved while Lehman Brothers and AIG face bankruptcy? I doubt very much that it will ever happen because of who is most likely involved in this debauchery. None of these companies should have been saved, it’s not the government’s job to bail out financial institutions or any other type of business’ that trade on the stock market.
.
For those who are not aware the U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry “Hank” Paulson is the former CEO of Goldman Sachs. You can click on the link if you’re interested in reading his biography on Wikipedia Ironically it’s also the only firm that doesn’t seem to be having any dire issues of going down the tubes. He was also given a compensation package that can be considered absurd. On top of that, the Daily Telegraph was quoted in July 2008 saying “Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson has intimate relations with the Chinese elite, dating from his days at Goldman Sachs when he visited the country over 70 times.”
.
As for Chris Cox the Chairman of the Security Exchange Commission, Where was he when this crap started over a year ago? How come it’s gone on this far? I don’t know everything, but I would like to know more about this issue. Some people made a ton of money today when most of us lost big time, my self included. We might never find out who really benefited from it all.
.
What I found interesting was the fact that these two guys were put in power by George Bush in 2005 and 2006 at the height of the housing market, which is also right before the crap hit the fan (go figure).
If you guys have any insight or comments to this post, please do so. I’m sure there’s someone out there that knows more about this than me.

Tags: , , ,

Related posts

The Fate Of Lehman Brothers (NYSE:LEH)


photo by Ernie McClellan

.

Let’s talk about Lehman Brothers first (like what else would be). This weekend has been filled with emergency meetings since Friday night and will continue through Sunday. The leaders of most banks have been meeting with Hank Paulson, who is the Treasury Secretary (for those who are still in the dark), the SEC Chairman Chris Cox and the New York Fed Chief Timothy Geithner. No details have been given, but they have said that the meetings are focused on “recent market conditions” (uh, duh).

.

What I don’t understand (but do agree with) is that there will be no “saving grace” from the government for Lehman like there was for Fannie, Freddie and Bear Sterns. The part that I don’t understand is why were the others bailed out, but not Lehman Brothers. Is Lehman the step-child to the financial sector or did someone from Lehman piss on the wrong tree? Considering that Lehman brothers has been around for over 150 years, I’m sure someone doesn’t like them. The Feds were concerned about Fannie and Freddie being bought buy outside governments or entities, but shouldn’t they worry about these guys just the same? As it is, it’s questionable that Barclay’s or Bank of America are even interested though they are they the likely candidates. Something smells rotten in Denmark.

.

Who know what the final outcome will be, but I will say that it will be interesting to see what the other firms will decide on as the fate of Lehman Brothers. Let’s be for real though, the companies that are involved with these meetings are facing the same problems that Lehman is going through, so who are they to come up with some great plan since they can’t even take care of themselves.

The firms that are involve include the likes of JP Morgan/Chase, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley. Ironically, Lehman Brothers’ Richard Fuld was not there

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Hostile Takeover Of Fannie (NYSE:FNM) And Freddie ...

Photobucket
photo by epic harmus

.

I know that it really isn’t a hostile one, but let’s be real. What is the federal government to do with the idea of being a mortgage lender? The federal government was never designed to operate in this manner. It’s bad enough that they’re the largest employer in this country.
.
We as taxpayers are going to bear the burden of this decision by Henry Paulson and George Bush. I understand the reason behind the fact that Freddie and Fannie can not do the job, but to have the government step in is a little over the top. The two of them were created by Congress back in 1938 and 1970 to help support the housing market. Being a sponsor and taking over are two different things. Unfortunately our politicians can’t tell the difference. Senator Chuck Schumer, a democrat from New York said, “there is more flexibility on the part of the government to try and help the housing market,”
We see how well they helped the market when they were allowing anyone with a pulse to qualify for a loan.
.
As for what the market thinks about this…
Mark Zandi, a chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com said, “Effectively, the federal government has now become the nation’s mortgage lender,” he said. “This takes a major financial threat off the table.” OK, maybe the rest of the financial sector will move forward from here, but don’t expect it anytime soon. I read this little tid-bit of information that Standard & Poor’s downgraded Fannie and Freddie’s preferred stock to junk-bond status, but reaffirmed the U.S. government’s triple-A rating after the Treasury department’s announcement. Go figure.
Analyst are predicting that this could cost taxpayers as much as $100 billion while the Treasury dept. tries to get a hold of the situation.
.
All I have to say about this from a traders point of view is to stay away from these two companies and find something else to invest into. I do believe that we will see a rise in the financial stocks this week but who knows which ones will be the lucky dog or the lame duck. If you want to play this news, the only way that I could possibly recommend is to get in the financial ETF, symbol XLF.
Whatever you do, Please do your homework first since I’ve been known to make mistakes from time to time.

Tags: , , ,

Related posts

Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE)

As if it couldn’t get any worse for Freddie Mac. The government-sponsored mortgage lender released their earning report today. Freddie reported a net loss of $821 million, or $1.63 per share, compared to a net profit of $729 million, or 96 cents per share, in the year-ago period. Analysts expected a loss of 41 cents a share, on average, according to Thomson Reuters. The most recent loss comes on top of a first-quarter dent of $151 million, or 66 cents per share. That is three times worse than what the street had expected as the bad housing market weighed down the stocks. To make matters Chairman and CEO Richard Syron stated that the dividends will be cut by 80% or more on the common shares.
.
This comes weeks after the Federal Reserve said that they will do what’s necessary to save the mortgage lender, as I stated in a recent post on the Federal Reserve. I guess they have their work cut out for them. The fed will have to just give them some more of our tax dollars to save them from their own mistakes.
.
Celent Senior Analyst Walter O’Haire says it “will be interesting to see are the terms investors will demand” for taking part in the offering. He noted the likelihood of further declines in the housing market, as well as uncertainty around what role the government will take in overseeing Freddie and sister company, Fannie Mae, now that it has outlined a plan to back the entities with billions in taxpayer dollars. The Treasury Department has hired Morgan Stanley to offer advice. “The only thing that does appear certain is that investors will seek additional guarantees from Freddie Mac in connection with investing in any future capital raising efforts,” O’Haire says.
.
I’ve mentioned in the past that the, financial sector is one that I try to stay away from. I’ve never been comfortable with trading them. With all the creative financing that can be done, I don’t trust the financials

Tags:

Related posts

Just Another Manic Monday

Photobucket
photo by epic harmus

.

What else was there to expect for a Monday? The market fell today on the fact that the Federal Reserve will be meeting tomorrow. The NASDAQ was hit the hardest by falling 1.1% (not too hard).
.
Earlier, the government reported on personal income and spending for June. Spending was up 0.6%, better than what was expected, and income rose 0.1%, ahead of the expectation for a decline of 0.1%. The core personal consumption expenditures index was rose 0.3%. the losses were a bit more, but the sell-off in crude lessen the pressure on the markets. Oil prices fell $3.69 to $121.41 even with the word of a storm in the Gulf of Mexico and a fire at a Valero refinery.

So if you have any hair left from you pulling it out. Get your comb and just wait till tomorrow and see what will happen with the Feds.

Tags:

Related posts

GDP (Gross Domestic Product) Vs GPI (Genuine Progr...

The GDP, aka Gross Domestic Product. The means by which our country’ growth is measured. The most common way to understand the GDP is the expenditure method.
.
GDP= consumption+gross investment+ government spending+(export-imports)
GDP= C+I+G+(X-M)
.
By my calculations, this equation can’t be as sound as it seem’. Am I to understand that government spending is to be looked upon as something good? From what I can see is that if consumption(personal) falls less than what government spending goes up, the GDP will still rise for that year. That would be looked upon as something good. That doesn’t sound right to me. When government spending rises, it leaves the politicians no other choice but to raise taxes. Which we all know you’ll be paying.
.
There are too many variables that need to be considered in this equation. That is why in 1995 the GPI(genuine Progress Indicator) was created. It takes into account those variables in each part of the GDP.

They both are based on the same personal consumption data, but that is where the similarities end. Here is the list of categories that they differ. The GPI makes a lot of sense to me. Then again, who am I?
.
The following information was provided by Lisa Smith @ Forbes.com.
.
* Personal Consumption – As mentioned, this is the exact same data used to calculate GDP.
* Income Distribution – GPI is adjusted upward when a greater percentage of the nation’s income goes to the poor because an income increase provides a tangible benefit to the poor. GPI is adjusted downward when the majority of a nation’s increased income goes to the rich.
* Housework, Volunteering, Higher education – GPI factors in the value of the labor that goes into housework and volunteering. It also factors in the benefit of an increasingly educated populace.
* Service of Consumer Durables and Infrastructure – Money spent on durable goods is treated as a cost, while the value the purchases provide is treated as a benefit. Long-lasting goods that provide benefits without having to be frequently repurchased are viewed positively. Goods that wear out quickly and drain consumers’ wallets when they must be replaced are viewed negatively. GDP, on the other hand, views all expenditures as good news. Infrastructure spending by the government is treated in a similar manner – if spending provides a long-lasting benefit, GPI views it as a positive; if spending drains the government’s coffers, GPI views it as a negative. Again, GDP views all spending as positive.
* Crime – Rising crime costs money in legal fees, medical bills, replacement costs, and other outlays. GDP views this spending as a positive development. GPI views it as a negative.
* Resource Depletion – When wetlands or forests are destroyed by economic activity, GDP views the events as good news for the economy; GPI views these events as bad news for future generations.
# Pollution – Pollution is good news for GDP. Industry gets paid once for the economic activity that creates pollution and again when money is spent to mitigate the pollution. GPI views pollution as a negative.
# Long-Term Environmental Damage – Global warming, nuclear waste storage, and other long-term consequences of economic activity are factored into GPI as negatives.
# Changes in Leisure Time – Prosperity should lead to an increase in leisure time. Most modern workers would disagree with this theory. GPI views an increase in leisure as a positive, and a decrease in leisure as a negative.
# Defensive Expenditures – Defensive expenditures refer to medical insurance, auto insurance, healthcare bills and other expenses that are required to maintain quality of life. GPI views these as a negative. GDP views them positively.
# Dependence on Foreign Assets – When a nation is forced to borrow from other nations in order to finance consumption, GPI factors in the result as a negative. If the borrowed money is for investments and benefits the country, it is viewed as a positive.
The Calculations
GPI calculations take all of these variables into consideration, using economic statistics and mathematical formulas to place value on them. That value is then added to or deleted from the GDP figure. For example, expenditures on consumer durables are a negative adjustment. Data from the National Income and Products Accounts are used to estimate the cost of consumer durables, and the figure is subtracted from GDP.

The amount of money that foreigners invest in the U.S. is subtracted from the amount Americans invest overseas. A five-year rolling average is used to determine whether the U.S. is becoming a lender or a borrower. If our economy is healthy enough that we are a net lender, the resulting number is added to GDP. If we are borrowing to sustain our economy, the resulting number is subtracted.

GPI Is Not Yet Mainstream
While GPI factors in to many of the variables that have direct impact on peoples’ quality of life, capitalist economies tend to focus strictly on making money. Because of this, GPI has not yet been widely adopted in such economies, although its proponents note that it has been reviewed by the scientific community and recognized for its validity. GPI-type measures are in use in Canada and in some of Europe’s small and more progressive nations. Over time, other nations might slowly adopt the concept as environmental concerns move into the public’s consciousness.
lisa smith @ forbes

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Weak Dollar

Photobucket
.
photo by ppdigital
.

Weak Dollar? Not if you’re a tourist from overseas. The weak dollar has tourist spending more money than ever before. There are less visitors coming here than last year, but their spending has increased year over year by about 20%. That may help us but it’s not what this country really needs.
.
What we need is a strong dollar. Today the dollar gain some strength today as oil dropped for the second day in a row. Gold slid back 2% as well, on the news from the Federal Reserve of talks on possible currency intervention. They may even increase the interest rates to help the dollar.
.
The markets rallied today. The Dow finished at 11,239.28, climbing over 276 points. We will have to wait and see where it goes tomorrow and going into the weekend. Today’s news helped, but possibly not enough to sustain the rally. I guess we’ll see.
.
Today’s performance was mainly based on the financial sector, namely Wells Fargo with a great earnings report. Some of the other banks increased by 10% or better today.
BAC +22% , ZION +22%, JPM +15%, WFC +32%
When banks are happy, the dollar is too.
.
The big winners were Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,. Both being up over 30% today. To think that one could possibly think of them as penny stocks(price being under $10 per share). One should have seen this coming being that Ben Bernanke stated that the Feds commitment to bring stability to the financial markets is a serious one.
.
Any one who may have seen the writing on the wall bought into some financial stocks in the last two days. I was underweight in the sector and since the news released on Monday has picked up some shares. I am more than happy with the gains & will be getting out very soon. As for the dollar, I do believe it will strengthen but not in the near future.
.
.
P.S. Want to learn more about the stock market? take a free two week trail with Jim Cramer from TheStreet.com

Tags: , , , ,

Related posts

Hasn’t The Federal Reserve Bank Done Enough ...

It seems that the Federal Reserve is going to be throwing a lifeline to Fannie and Freddie.
.
The plan must still be approved by Congress (which could mean that this may take awhile), but the Fed will not only serve as the lender of last resort to the ailing mortgage buyers but will also play a consult type role in their regulation.
The news this week comes four months after the Fed facilitated JPMorgan Chase’s $30 billion buyout of Bear Stearns and the Bush administration’s blueprint to overhaul the U.S. financial regulatory system, granting the Fed even more power. (isn’t that scary)

By coincidence, the central bank on Monday approved a new rule designed to protect consumers from deceptive lending practices, including advertising practices that say interest rates are fixed when in fact they’re not. It applies to all mortgage lenders, not just those under the Fed’s control.
.
I my opinion, It looks like the Fed are trying to fixed everything that they’ve been laid-back on for the last few years.
.
Starting tomorrow, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke begins two days of testimony on Capitol Hill as he delivers his semiannual economic report to lawmakers. He’ll talk about the growing threat of inflation, the government’s response to the Fannie and Freddie meltdown, the Fed’s recent actions to curb irresponsible lending and the overall economic outlook.

I don’t expect him to say the Federal Reserve is gaining too much authority

Tags: , , ,

Related posts